First of two parts
If you havenât seen it in the news, after its stock price broke the $800 barrierÂ last month, Google moved into the No. 3 position among the most valuable firms in the world.
Google is clearly the youngest firm among the leaders; it has surprisingly been less than a decade since Googleâs IPO.
Most companies on the top 20 market cap list could be accurately described as âold school,â because most can attribute their success to being nearly half a century old, having a long established product brand, or through great acquisitions. Googleâs market success can instead be attributed to what can only be labeled as extraordinary people management practices that result from its use of âpeople analytics.â
A new kind of people management
The extraordinary marketplace success of Google (andÂ Apple, which is No. 1 on the list) is beginning to force many business leaders to take notice and to come to the realization that there is now a new path to corporate greatness.
âNew pathâ firms dominate by producing continuous innovation. And executives are beginning to learn that continuous innovation cannot occur until a firm makes a strategic shift toward a focus on great people management.
A strategic focus on people management is necessary because innovations come from people, and you simply canât maximize innovations unless you are capable of recruiting and retaining innovators. And even then, you must provide them with great managers and an environment that supports innovation.
Unfortunately, making that transition to an innovative firm is problematic because almost every current HR function operates under 20th century principles of past practices, efficiency, risk avoidance, legal compliance, and hunch-based people management decisions. If you want serial innovation, you will need to reinvent traditional HR and the processes that drive innovation.
Shifting to data-based people management
The basic premise of the âpeople analyticsâ approach is that accurate people management decisions are the most important and impactful decisions that a firm can make. You simply canât produce superior business results unless your managers are making accurate people management decisions.
Many do argue that product R&D, marketing, or resource allocation decisions are instead the most impactful decisions. However, each one of those business decisions is made by an employee. If you hire and retain mostly mediocre people and you provide them with little data, you can only assume that they will make mediocre decisions in each of these important business areas, as well as in people management decisions.
No one in finance, supply chain, marketing, etc. would ever propose a solution in their area without a plethora of charts, graphs, and data to support it, but HR is known to all too frequently rely instead on trust and relationships. People costs often approach 60 percent of corporate variable costs, so it makes sense to manage such a large cost item analytically.
Another major problem in HR is its traditional reliance on relationships. Relationships are the antithesis of analytical decision-making. The decision-making âcurrencyâ for most business decisions has long been data, but up until now, HR has relied on a different currency: that of building relationships.
In direct contrast, Googleâs success has to be attributed in large part to the fact that it is the worldâs only data-driven HR function. Googleâs business success should convince executives at any firm that wants to grow dramatically that they must at least consider adopting the data and analytically based model used by Google. Its approach has resulted in Google producing amazing workforce productivity results that few can match (on average, each employee generates nearly $1 million in revenue and $200,000 in profit each year).
How does the Google approach reinvent HR?
HR at Google is dramatically different from the hundreds of other HR functions that I have researched and worked with. To start with, at Google itâs not called human resources; instead, the function is called âpeople operations.â The VP and HR leader Laszlo Bock has justifiably learned to demand data-based decisions everywhere.
People management decisions at Google are guided by the powerful âpeople analytics team.â Two key quotes from the team highlight their goals:
- âAll people decisions at Google are based on data and analytics.â
- The goal is to â¦ âbring the same level of rigor to people-decisions that we do to engineering decisions.â
Google is replacing the 20th century subjective decision-making approach in HR. Although it calls its approach âpeople analytics,â it can alternatively be called âdata-based decision-making,â âalgorithm based decision-making,â or âfact or evidence-based decision-making.â
Top 10 reasons for Googleâs people analytics approach
The people analytics team reports directly to the VP and it has a representative in each major HR function. It produces many products, including employee surveys that are not anonymous, and dashboards. It also attempts to identify insightful correlations and to provide recommended actions. The goal is to substitute data and metrics for the use of opinions.
Almost everyone has by now heard about Googleâs free food, 20% time, and wide range of fun activities but realize that each of these was implemented and are maintained based on data. Many of Googleâs people analytics approaches are so unusual and powerful, I can only describe them as âbreathtaking.â
Below I have listed my âTop 10â of Googleâs past and current people management practices to highlight its data-driven approach:
- Leadership characteristics and the role of managers âts âproject oxygenâ research analyzed reams of internal data and determined that great managers are essential for top performance and retention. It further identified the eight characteristics of great leaders. The data proved that rather than superior technical knowledge, periodic one-on-one coaching which included expressing interest in the employee and frequent personalized feedback ranked as the No. 1 key to being a successful leader. Managers are rated twice a year by their employees on their performance on the eight factors.
- The PiLab â Googleâs PiLab is a unique subgroup that no other firm has. It conducts applied experiments within Google to determine the most effective approaches for managing people and maintaining a productive environment (including the type of reward that makes employees the happiest). The lab even improved employee health by reducing the calorie intake of its employees at their eating facilities by relying on scientific data and experiments (by simply reducing the size of the plates).
- A retention algorithm â Google developed a mathematical algorithm to proactively and successfully predict which employees are most likely to become a retention problem. This approach allows management to act before itâs too late and it further allows retention solutions to be personalized.
- Predictive modeling â People management is forward looking at Google. As a result, it develops predictive models and use âwhat ifâ analysis to continually improve their forecasts of upcoming people management problems and opportunities. It also uses analytics to produce more effective workforce planning, which is essential in a rapidly growing and changing firm.
- Improving diversity â Unlike most firms, analytics are used at Google to solve diversity problems. As a result, the people analytics team conducted analysis to identify the root causes of weak diversity recruiting, retention, and promotions (especially among women engineers). The results that it produced in hiring, retention, and promotion were dramatic and measurable.
- An effective hiring algorithm â One of the few firms to approach recruiting scientifically, Google developed an algorithm for predicting which candidates had the highest probability of succeeding after they are hired. Its research also determined that little value was added beyond four interviews, dramatically shortening time to hire. Google is also unique in its strategic approach to hiring because its hiring decisions are made by a group in order to prevent individual hiring managers from hiring people for their own short-term needs. Under âProject Janus,â it developed an algorithm for each large job family that analyzed rejected resumes to identify any top candidates who they might have missed. They found that they had only a 1.5% miss rate, and as a result they hired some of the revisited candidates.
- Calculating the value of top performers â Google executives have calculated the performance differential between an exceptional technologist and an average one (as much as 300 times higher). Proving the value of top performers convinces executives to provide the resources necessary to hire, retain, and develop extraordinary talent. Googleâs best-kept secret is that people operations professionals make the best âbusiness caseâ of any firm in any industry, which is the primary reason why they receive such extraordinary executive support.
- Workplace design drives collaboration â Google has an extraordinary focus on increasing collaboration between employees from different functions. It has found that increased innovation comes from a combination of three factors: discovery (i.e. learning), collaboration, and fun. It consciously designs its workplaces to maximize learning, fun, and collaboration (it even tracks the time spent by employees in the cafÃ© lines to maximize collaboration). Managing âfunâ may seem superfluous to some, but the data indicates that it is a major factor in attraction, retention, and collaboration.
- Increasing discovery and learning âÂ Rather than focusing on traditional classroom learning, the emphasis is on hands-on learning (the vast majority of people learn through on the job learning). Google has increased discovery and learning through project rotations, learning from failures, and even through inviting people like Al Gore and Lady Gaga to speak to their employees. Clearly self-directed continuous learning and the ability to adapt are key employee competencies at Google.
- It doesnât dictate; it convinces with data â The final key to Googleâs people analytics teamâs success occurs not during the analysis phase, but instead when it present its final proposals to executives and managers. Rather than demanding or forcing managers to accept its approach, it instead acts as internal consultants and influences people to change based on the powerful data and the action recommendations that they present. Because its Â audiences are highly analytical (as most executives are), it uses data to change preset opinions and to influence.
Article originally published Here.
Originally Posted at: How Google Is Using People Analytics To Completely Reinvent HR